The other day, as I was looking through some back issues at the Summerland Review, I noticed once again how much our language and way of writing have changed in recent years.
The news articles and the letters to the editor had a much more formal tone than the writing of today.
Contractions don’t show up too often in writing from earlier decades. Today, they’re much more common.
Still, one writer I respect today is adamant that contractions shouldn’t be used in written English. They’re fine in dialogue, but nowhere else.
I have also read plenty of contemporary fiction and nonfiction where this rule is broken.
The phrase, “excited for,” doesn’t appear in the older newspapers, and I know some writers who avoid it because they believe it should be “excited about.”
But others, especially entertainment writers, have no qualms about “excited for.”
Words like “data” and “plan” were around in the 1920s, but the term “data plan” is something much more recent, describing something that did not exist until quite recently.
Policeman and fireman were common in past decades, but today those words sound archaic. Now we have police officers and firefighters. We also have councillors instead of aldermen.
Even the use of slurs and obscenities has been changing. Some terms, once uttered freely, are no longer spoken, while words once considered offensive can be heard everywhere, and are even finding their way into print.
Each year, when linguists and lexicographers announce their choice for the word of the year, writers will take notice.
Recently, the use of the word “they” came into the conversation as the editors of Merriam-Webster listed it as their word of the year for 2019.
It has become used as an inclusive way to refer to people without making reference to gender.
The word, particularly “they” as a singular term, attracted a lot of attention during the past year.
But this isn’t the first time the singular “they” has received attention.
In 2015, the American Dialect Association selected “they” as their word of the year, since it was coming into use by some who do not use “he” or “she” as their pronouns of choice.
I have heard the singular “they” since the early 1980s, and for many years, the Canadian Press Stylebook — the style guide used by most English-language newspapers in Canada — has allowed “they” as a singular word, but only if there is no other reasonable way to structure a sentence.
The style guide also notes that the singular use of they is increasingly accepted.
Still, quite a few writers believe “they” must always refer to groups of people, never just one person.
However, not all linguists and lexicographers identified “they” as their word of choice last year.
The people at Oxford Dictionaries chose “climate emergency” as their term for 2019.
The term was prominent over the past year. It reflects a shift in dialogue about climate-related discussions.
By the end of this year, Merriam-Webster, Oxford Dictionaries and other organizations will likely select different terms as their word or phrase of the year.
These designations are important because the English language is changing and evolving. New words and changes in meaning are signs that our language is a vibrant and living language, adapting to the needs of its speakers.
I won’t say I’m excited for the choices of “they” and “climate emergency” as words of the year, but that’s only because I dislike the phrase, “excited for.”
However, I will take note when a new word of phrase enters our lexicon, or when the meaning or usage of a familiar word begins to change.
After all, I need to watch my language.
John Arendt is the editor of the Summerland Review.
To report a typo, email: