Report suggests Princeton needs millions of dollars for flood prevention

The level of concern about flooding in Princeton in the spring of 2018 was certainly high – and the municipality is now applying for a $150,000 grant to fund flood risk assessment, including mapping and mitigation planning.

“I think 2018 was one of the more concerning years,” said Mayor Spencer Coyne. “The freshet was higher than normal but so were groundwater levels. Fortunately the worst case scenario didn’t happen but it should have been a wake up call for everyone who lives along the water ways of the Similkameen watershed.”

Related: Princeton area prepares for what may be torrential flood waters

A report commissioned by the RDOS, and produced by Dobson Engineering, details the impact of flood activity in town and was recently released by the municipality.

It identifies flood risks at four separate locations, and makes recommendations for extending dikes – and other measures – to protect property and infrastructure in the future.

“November 1995 was our last major flood in Princeton. A lot of work was done after that flood to our diking system. It is important to know where we are. There has been development along the river down by Burton Avenue, Similkameen Avenue and past Pines – not to mention the changes upstream and how that will impact water flows,” said Coyne.

“What worried me personally during last years flood season was the amount of water flow that was predicted. I was confident in our Emergency Operations team and our ESS team the coordination and organization at our local Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) put most of my concerns at ease as we worked though the event.”

The Dobson report was a “cursory review”, that lacked in depth analysis as well as mitigation measures, according to a staff report. The grant, if obtained, will provide for more information and planning.

However in summary the document suggests that permanent solutions for addressing flooding in vulnerable areas in town could top $5 million.

That is not a surprise, said Coyne.

“Not at all. Diking is an expensive endeavour and it has to be done right. We watched as Grand Forks was devastated by flooding last year.”

Following are the four identified risk areas, with information extracted from the Dobson Report.

Related: South Okanagan community gets kudos for proactive flood work

Related: A new low: thief steals sandbags from home threatened by flood

Similkameen River

Issue – Public safety with flood risks along sections of the Similkameen River within the town where there are no flood protection works.

Risks – There is a reach on the Similkameen River within the town that is not protected. The adjacent resident and commercial areas and highway are at risk of being damaged by flood waters.

Permanent solution – A standard dike – 1,200 meters – designed and consistent with the provincial diking standards, is required from the east end of the existing dike near Stout Street to the Highway 3 bridge.

Estimated cost – $3 million.

Tulameen River

Issue – Public safety with flooding of residential areas from Tulameen River.

Risks – A section along the Tulameen River between 438 and 488 Corina Avenue has no flood protection works and is at risk of flooding from high flows in the river.

Permanent solution – A standard dike constructed – 675 meters.

Estimated cost – $1.3 million

Confluence of Similkameen and Tulameen Rivers

Issue – Public safety. The former KVR railway grade is the only form of flood protection for the city at the confluence and it was never designed for this purpose.

Risks – If the rail grade was to fail Highway 5A and adjacent residential and commercial may be at risk.

Permanent solution – The former rail grade could be constructed to provincial standards and armoured with riprap.

Estimated cost – $800,000.

China Creek

Issue – Public safety with debris jams from vegetation encroaching a neighbourhood in town.

Risks – Flows in the China Creek channel from Tulameen Avenue to Tulameen River are obstructed by encroaching vegetation that caused flood damage to adjacent dwellings during the 2018 freshnet flows.

Permanent solution – Remove vegetation and woody debris from the channel.

Estimated cost (included reclamation planting) – $20,000.

To report a typo, email:

Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Just Posted

Wildfire sparks beside Highway 3 west of Keremeos

A wildfire on the side of Highway 3 just west of Keremeos… Continue reading

Rain in the forecast for much of the Southern Interior

Rain for much of the day in most areas clearing in the evening

Warmer fall weather could extend wildfire season: AccuWeather

Above seasonal temperatures are expected throughout September, October and November

Town experiments with protecting eroding brown bridge deck

Unusual wear and tear on the decking of Princeton’s brown bridge has… Continue reading

Word on the Street: Festivalgoers at the 27th annual Salmon Arm Roots and Blues

The Observer asked: Where are you from and what brought you to the festival?

Grass fire breaks out on highway south of Vernon

Highway 97 traffic slowed as firefighters snuff grass fire

Access to Okanagan Rail Trail to be limited by erosion work

The work will be done throughout September but won’t begin before the Labour Day weekend

Suspicious fire rips through abandoned Okanagan home

A fire was reported on Francescutti Court in Kelowna just after 1 a.m. Friday morning

Summerland relaunches net metering program

Event open house will be held Aug. 27 from 3 to 6 p.m in Arena Banquet Room

Conan turns to the Property Brothers for tips on buying Greenland

Jonathan Scott suggests removing glaciers and mountains to bring in ‘more natural light’

Jaws of Life used to rescue driver in North Okanagan crash

Single-vehicle MVI causes traffic delays on Highway 6

Forests minister visits B.C. town rocked by multiple mill shutdowns

A third of Mackenzie turns out for rally, not much to cheer about

B.C. sockeye returns drop as official calls 2019 ‘extremely challenging’

Federal government says officials are seeing the same thing off Alaska and Washington state

Most Read